Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2, after paragraph 1

Joint communication on humanitarian aid

Vote
Amendment 2, after paragraph 1
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2026
Result
255 for · 315 against · 19 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 July 2026, 13:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
B10-0339/2026 – After § 1 – Am 2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0339
Dossier
2026/2734(RSP)
Vote id
195609
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 255 for, 315 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 43 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 107Against 0Abst. 1No vote 27 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 47Against 9Abst. 9No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.58
EPPFor 7Against 146Abst. 1No vote 30 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 2Against 62Abst. 1No vote 19 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 18 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 3Against 20Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
No groupFor 8Against 11Abst. 6No vote 3 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria200
Germany1300
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1900
Finland200
France800
Greece200
Croatia400
Ireland100
Italy1200
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta300
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal700
Romania501
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 589 members

No vote recorded, 130

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 130 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 502 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 509 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 496 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 112 — part 3 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSplit vote284 for, 335 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.91 518 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 508 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.91 556 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, point u Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAmendment284 for, 333 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.90 541 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 513 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital I The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment274 for, 323 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 564 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 123 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment275 for, 374 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 541 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195609
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2, after paragraph 1 — Joint communication on humanitarian aid”. Vote, 9 July 2026. votingId 195609, reference 2026/2734(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195609 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-09-195609,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2, after paragraph 1 — Joint communication on humanitarian aid}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195609}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-09/195609},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195609, reference 2026/2734(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}