Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 29 to paragraph 44

EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)

Vote
Amendment 29 to paragraph 44
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 8 Jul 2026
Result
148 for · 500 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 July 2026, 13:17
More facts (6)
Position
vote 19 of 43 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0182/2026 – Javi López, Borja Giménez Larraz – § 44 – Am 29
Text
Report A-10-2026-0182
Dossier
2025/0810R
Vote id
195377
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 148 for, 500 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 22 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 117Abst. 8No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
RenewFor 0Against 72Abst. 1No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 1Against 172Abst. 1No vote 11 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 0Against 76Abst. 2No vote 6 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 39Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
ESNFor 3Against 23Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 15Against 5Abst. 6No vote 1 of 27Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria040
Cyprus020
Czechia050
Germany0310
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0180
Finland120
France050
Greece070
Croatia051
Hungary060
Ireland040
Italy080
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland0230
Portugal060
Romania0100
Sweden050
Slovenia050
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

No vote recorded, 53

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 53 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 83, adding text after recital 1 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)Amendment113 for, 493 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 569 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 92, adding text after paragraph 43 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment116 for, 481 against, 53 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 602 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment98 for, 464 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 567 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 84 to recital 2 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)Amendment123 for, 476 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 580 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 82, adding text after recital 1 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)Amendment94 for, 503 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 586 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina FasoAmendment99 for, 407 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 522 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 86, adding text after recital 7 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)Amendment97 for, 486 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 577 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment113 for, 441 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 560 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 Competition policy – annual report 2025Amendment136 for, 463 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 633 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 23 to paragraph 12 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionAmendment143 for, 492 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 612 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195377
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 29 to paragraph 44 — EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)”. Vote, 8 July 2026. votingId 195377, reference 2025/0810R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195377 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-08-195377,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 29 to paragraph 44 — EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195377}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-08/195377},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195377, reference 2025/0810R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}