Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Request for urgent procedure

Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse

Vote
Request for urgent procedure
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 7 Jul 2026
Result
331 for · 304 against · 11 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
7 July 2026, 13:29
More facts (4)
Effect
Urgent procedure agreed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
C10-0178/2026 – Request for an urgent decision
Vote id
195338
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 331 for, 304 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 51 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Urgent procedure agreed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 29Abst. 1No vote 15 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 80Against 39Abst. 5No vote 11 of 135Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
RenewFor 28Against 46Abst. 0No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.43
EPPFor 172Against 1Abst. 2No vote 10 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 17Against 52Abst. 2No vote 11 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.60
PatriotsFor 34Against 35Abst. 1No vote 15 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 0Against 28Abst. 0No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia601
Denmark100
Spain050
France1830
Greece010
Hungary900
Italy050
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland030
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 29 to Article 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAmendment344 for, 236 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.64 571 voters
30 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 16 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassmentSeparate vote330 for, 111 against, 117 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.60 514 voters
11 Feb 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Central Bank – annual report 2024Final378 for, 233 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.58 564 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation AgreementFinal473 for, 114 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.57 574 voters
22 May 2025Final vote Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratioFinal436 for, 149 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.55 521 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment438 for, 196 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.55 571 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment451 for, 182 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.54 571 voters
10 Sept 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term reviewFinal440 for, 168 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.53 592 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 48 — part 8 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote475 for, 134 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.53 569 voters
26 Nov 2025Paragraph 17 — part 1 Protection of minors onlineSplit vote416 for, 152 against, 92 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.51 595 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195338
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Request for urgent procedure — Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse”. Vote, 7 July 2026. votingId 195338. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195338 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-07-195338,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Request for urgent procedure — Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195338}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195338},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195338. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}