Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5 to paragraph 34

A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector

Vote
Amendment 5 to paragraph 34
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 7 Jul 2026
Result
210 for · 393 against · 45 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
7 July 2026, 13:51
More facts (6)
Position
vote 13 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0169/2026 – Matthias Ecke – § 34 – Am 5
Text
Report A-10-2026-0169
Dossier
2024/2117(INI)
Vote id
195216
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 210 for, 393 against, 45 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 27Against 2Abst. 2No vote 14 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 115Against 6Abst. 5No vote 9 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 1Against 72Abst. 0No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 1Against 160Abst. 8No vote 16 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 9 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 46Abst. 29No vote 10 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 9Abst. 1No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia010
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
Finland010
France030
Greece020
Italy0220
Lithuania010
Latvia030
Netherlands030
Poland0200
Romania060
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 556 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 579 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 435 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 Enforcement of the Digital Markets ActAmendment186 for, 326 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 522 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment209 for, 359 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 545 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, after point d Recommendation on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the regionAmendment210 for, 415 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 634 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 580 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 580 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 579 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 550 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195216
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 — A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector”. Vote, 7 July 2026. votingId 195216, reference 2024/2117(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195216 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-07-195216,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 — A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195216}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195216},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195216, reference 2024/2117(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}