Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3 to paragraph 27

A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector

Vote
Amendment 3 to paragraph 27
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 7 Jul 2026
Result
283 for · 341 against · 34 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
7 July 2026, 13:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0169/2026 – Matthias Ecke – § 27 – Am 3
Text
Report A-10-2026-0169
Dossier
2024/2117(INI)
Vote id
195207
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 283 for, 341 against, 34 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 43 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 21Against 1Abst. 9No vote 14 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.52
GreensFor 49Against 1Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 4No vote 7 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 72Against 0Abst. 2No vote 4 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 5Against 170Abst. 0No vote 10 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 0Against 68Abst. 5No vote 9 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 70Abst. 5No vote 10 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 11Against 9Abst. 8No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Germany206
Spain010
France001
Greece130
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania010
Slovakia501

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 556 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 1 Application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative processAmendment262 for, 327 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 562 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 19 Political situation in Myanmar including the humanitarian crisis of the RohingyaAmendment263 for, 291 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 537 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to recital J The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment292 for, 348 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 620 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 1, point f Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment299 for, 336 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 593 voters
8 Jul 2025Motion for adjournment of the vote Preserving the memory of the victims of the post war communist period in SloveniaOther278 for, 352 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 43 %r · shared0.91 588 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment277 for, 349 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 595 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 138 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment289 for, 349 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 601 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendments 1 + 25 (voted as one), adding text after citation 21 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment301 for, 335 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 599 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 30 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote302 for, 336 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 46 %r · shared0.91 588 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195207
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3 to paragraph 27 — A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector”. Vote, 7 July 2026. votingId 195207, reference 2024/2117(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195207 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-07-195207,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3 to paragraph 27 — A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195207}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-07/195207},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195207, reference 2024/2117(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}