Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE and The Left groups — Surveillance by illegal spyware

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE and The Left groups – Surveillance by illegal spyware

Vote
Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE and The Left groups — Surveillance by illegal spyware
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 6 Jul 2026
Result
221 for · 213 against · 12 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
6 July 2026, 18:18
More facts (4)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE and The Left groups – Surveillance by illegal spyware
Vote id
195336
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 221 for, 213 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 84Against 0Abst. 0No vote 51 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 30 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 120Abst. 1No vote 63 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 1Against 24Abst. 6No vote 51 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
PatriotsFor 1Against 59Abst. 1No vote 24 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ESNFor 3Against 5Abst. 3No vote 16 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.18
No groupFor 14Against 5Abst. 1No vote 9 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium011
Cyprus010
Czechia001
Spain010
France010
Greece100
Italy060
Latvia010
Netherlands011
Poland090
Romania030
Sweden003

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 446 members

No vote recorded, 273

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 273 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendments 1 + 25 (voted as one), adding text after citation 21 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment301 for, 335 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 408 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 57 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment316 for, 327 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 406 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to recital J The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment292 for, 348 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 421 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 138 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment289 for, 349 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 406 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment283 for, 358 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 404 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 22 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment293 for, 352 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 402 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 23 to paragraph 10 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment252 for, 305 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 358 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 403 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital O — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote269 for, 302 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.92 370 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.91 389 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-06/195336
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE and The Left groups — Surveillance by illegal spyware — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE and The Left groups – Surveillance by illegal spyware”. Vote, 6 July 2026. votingId 195336. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-06/195336 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 6 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 6 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-06, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-06/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-07-06-195336,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE and The Left groups — Surveillance by illegal spyware — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE and The Left groups – Surveillance by illegal spyware}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-06},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-06/195336}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-07-06/195336},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 195336. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-06-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-06 (CC BY 4.0)}
}