Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2026
Result
108 for · 436 against · 24 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:15
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 12 on the decision
Official label
A10-0158/2025 – Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas – Proposal for rejection – Am 422
Text
Report A-10-2025-0158
Dossier
2023/0284(COD)
Vote id
194417
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 108 for, 436 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 19 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 7 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 107Abst. 0No vote 28 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 62Abst. 0No vote 16 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 142Abst. 0No vote 43 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 11Against 37Abst. 17No vote 17 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
PatriotsFor 58Against 0Abst. 6No vote 21 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 7Abst. 1No vote 6 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium020
Bulgaria040
Czechia050
Germany0270
Denmark020
Estonia010
Spain0150
Finland020
France030
Greece060
Croatia030
Hungary060
Ireland040
Italy060
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland0210
Portugal060
Romania060
Sweden050
Slovenia030
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 568 members

No vote recorded, 151

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 151 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Amendment 85, adding text after Article 8 Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034Amendment138 for, 532 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 542 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 392 to Article 4, après le paragraph 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment138 for, 504 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.92 507 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 5 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025Amendment116 for, 502 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 521 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 391 to Article 4, paragraph 1, après le point b Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment138 for, 508 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.91 508 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 6 EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment110 for, 450 against, 84 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 521 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 32 to paragraph 12 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment133 for, 445 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 523 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Data Protection SupervisorAmendment118 for, 507 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 513 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesAmendment131 for, 508 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 519 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 6 to recital Y The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment122 for, 432 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 466 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 31 to paragraph 11 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment130 for, 447 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 522 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194417
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Proposal to reject the text — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Vote, 18 June 2026. votingId 194417, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194417 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-18-194417,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194417}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194417},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194417, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}