Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 30, after Recital 68

Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed

Vote
Amendment 30, after Recital 68
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
261 for · 365 against · 30 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 13:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 34 of 34 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0175/2026 – Jessica Polfjärd – After Recital 68 – Am 30
Text
Report A-10-2026-0175
Dossier
2023/0226(COD)
Vote id
194441
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 261 for, 365 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 40 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 2Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 40Against 4Abst. 2No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
S&DFor 81Against 39Abst. 5No vote 10 of 135Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
RenewFor 11Against 59Abst. 0No vote 8 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
EPPFor 8Against 141Abst. 14No vote 22 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 22Against 55Abst. 0No vote 5 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.57
PatriotsFor 17Against 60Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
ESNFor 17Against 3Abst. 6No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
No groupFor 23Against 2Abst. 3No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium030
Bulgaria014
Cyprus011
Czechia050
Germany2260
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0210
Finland130
France050
Greece007
Croatia401
Ireland040
Italy060
Lithuania020
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland0230
Portugal070
Romania090
Sweden050
Slovenia021
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 63

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 63 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther149 for, 251 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 36 %r · shared0.65 376 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 32 to Article 3, paragraph 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment227 for, 390 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.64 610 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 11 to paragraph 14 Competition policy – annual report 2024Amendment88 for, 335 against, 128 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.64 499 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 35 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027Amendment159 for, 372 against, 136 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 614 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 1, after point aj Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment201 for, 411 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.62 595 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment233 for, 330 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.62 545 voters
26 Nov 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weaponsFinal88 for, 388 against, 184 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.61 604 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 30 to Article 1, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment235 for, 387 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.61 610 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 2 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment243 for, 384 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.61 602 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1 — part 1 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025Amendment215 for, 346 against, 98 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.61 607 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194441
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 30, after Recital 68 — Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194441, reference 2023/0226(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194441 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194441,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 30, after Recital 68 — Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194441}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194441},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194441, reference 2023/0226(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}