Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 27, after Recital 15

Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed

Vote
Amendment 27, after Recital 15
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
212 for · 424 against · 29 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 13:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 26 of 34 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0175/2026 – Jessica Polfjärd – After Recital 15 – Am 27
Text
Report A-10-2026-0175
Dossier
2023/0226(COD)
Vote id
194437
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 212 for, 424 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 2Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 40Against 5Abst. 1No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
S&DFor 38Against 87Abst. 2No vote 8 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
RenewFor 9Against 61Abst. 0No vote 8 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
EPPFor 7Against 145Abst. 17No vote 16 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 20Against 55Abst. 1No vote 6 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
PatriotsFor 13Against 63Abst. 3No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
ESNFor 17Against 4Abst. 5No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
No groupFor 26Against 2Abst. 0No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium040
Bulgaria030
Germany170
Denmark040
Estonia010
Spain010
Finland030
France0130
Ireland140
Italy010
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania020
Sweden030
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 665 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment111 for, 507 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.69 587 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment140 for, 475 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 589 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment128 for, 431 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.65 570 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 18 Competition policy – annual report 2024Amendment89 for, 411 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.64 512 voters
21 May 2025Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther102 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.64 452 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital D Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina FasoAmendment119 for, 407 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 551 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 97 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAmendment123 for, 506 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 604 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAmendment62 for, 418 against, 68 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 539 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 13 to paragraph 38 Competition policy – annual report 2024Amendment60 for, 427 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 518 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 20 to Article 2 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment220 for, 380 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 586 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194437
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 27, after Recital 15 — Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194437, reference 2023/0226(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194437 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194437,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 27, after Recital 15 — Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194437}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194437},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194437, reference 2023/0226(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}