Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendments 18 + 26 (voted as one), after Recital 1

Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed

Vote
Amendments 18 + 26 (voted as one), after Recital 1
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
209 for · 433 against · 19 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 13:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 25 of 34 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0175/2026 – Jessica Polfjärd – After Recital 1 – Am 18= 26=
Text
Report A-10-2026-0175
Dossier
2023/0226(COD)
Vote id
194436
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 209 for, 433 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 2No vote 1 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 39Against 4Abst. 3No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
S&DFor 31Against 88Abst. 6No vote 10 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.56
RenewFor 12Against 57Abst. 0No vote 9 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
EPPFor 3Against 160Abst. 6No vote 16 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 20Against 57Abst. 0No vote 5 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.61
PatriotsFor 16Against 61Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
ESNFor 21Against 4Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
No groupFor 25Against 2Abst. 1No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium030
Czechia070
Denmark010
Spain060
France0280
Greece010
Hungary800
Italy060
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland300
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment111 for, 507 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 584 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment140 for, 475 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 586 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 20 to Article 2 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment220 for, 380 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.68 584 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment128 for, 431 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.66 568 voters
21 May 2025Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther102 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.66 449 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 18 Competition policy – annual report 2024Amendment89 for, 411 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 509 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital D Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina FasoAmendment119 for, 407 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 547 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital P European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment129 for, 499 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by Patriots, The Leftr · shared0.66 621 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 6 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment93 for, 517 against, 67 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 616 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 13 to paragraph 38 Competition policy – annual report 2024Amendment60 for, 427 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.65 515 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194436
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendments 18 + 26 (voted as one), after Recital 1 — Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194436, reference 2023/0226(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194436 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194436,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendments 18 + 26 (voted as one), after Recital 1 — Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194436}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194436},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194436, reference 2023/0226(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}