Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 8 to article 9, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, after point d

Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed

Vote
Amendment 8 to article 9, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, after point d
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
269 for · 355 against · 33 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 13:45
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 34 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0175/2026 – Jessica Polfjärd – Article 9, § 1, sub§ 2, after point d – Am 8
Text
Report A-10-2026-0175
Dossier
2023/0226(COD)
Vote id
194428
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 269 for, 355 against, 33 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 41 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 2Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 39Against 4Abst. 2No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
S&DFor 85Against 27Abst. 12No vote 11 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.53
RenewFor 11Against 59Abst. 0No vote 8 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
EPPFor 8Against 144Abst. 16No vote 17 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 22Against 55Abst. 0No vote 5 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.57
PatriotsFor 16Against 60Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
ESNFor 22Against 2Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 25Against 2Abst. 1No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1211
France001
Hungary100
Italy010
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Amendment 32 to Article 3, paragraph 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment227 for, 390 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.68 609 voters
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther149 for, 251 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 36 %r · shared0.67 376 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 11 to paragraph 14 Competition policy – annual report 2024Amendment88 for, 335 against, 128 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.66 500 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment233 for, 330 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.64 543 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 76 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment228 for, 409 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.64 611 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 35 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027Amendment159 for, 372 against, 136 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 615 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 30 to Article 1, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment235 for, 387 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 609 voters
15 Dec 2025Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group (tanker) Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group (tanker)Other181 for, 261 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 40 %r · shared0.63 418 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 1, after point aj Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment201 for, 411 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.63 594 voters
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 5 — part 4 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rightsSplit vote258 for, 284 against, 83 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.63 563 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194428
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 8 to article 9, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, after point d — Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194428, reference 2023/0226(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194428 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194428,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8 to article 9, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, after point d — Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194428}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194428},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194428, reference 2023/0226(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}