Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 91, after Recital 4

Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)

Vote
Amendment 91, after Recital 4
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
297 for · 267 against · 87 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 13:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 16 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0161/2026 – Tomáš Kubín – After Recital 4 – Am 91
Text
Report A-10-2026-0161
Dossier
2025/0580(CNS)
Vote id
194128
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 297 for, 267 against, 87 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 46 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 1Abst. 5No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 14Against 147Abst. 7No vote 17 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
ECRFor 5Against 33Abst. 39No vote 5 of 82Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
PatriotsFor 0Against 48Abst. 29No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
ESNFor 1Against 24Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 7Against 14Abst. 6No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium300
Bulgaria050
Cyprus020
Czechia320
Germany1270
Denmark110
Estonia020
Spain0210
Finland400
France040
Greece070
Croatia050
Hungary050
Ireland040
Italy160
Lithuania020
Luxembourg002
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland0230
Portugal070
Romania090
Sweden005
Slovenia030
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

No vote recorded, 68

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 68 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.87 618 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 138 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment289 for, 349 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 600 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 556 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Oct 2025Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 590 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 30 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote302 for, 336 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 46 %r · shared0.86 583 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 1, point f Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment299 for, 336 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 593 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.86 570 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment264 for, 252 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 536 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 4 — part 3 Banking Union – annual report 2025Split vote263 for, 310 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 537 voters
29 Apr 2026Citation 44 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote277 for, 342 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.86 572 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194128
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 91, after Recital 4 — Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194128, reference 2025/0580(CNS). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194128 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194128,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 91, after Recital 4 — Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194128}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194128},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194128, reference 2025/0580(CNS). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}