Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 95 to article 12, paragraph 4

Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)

Vote
Amendment 95 to article 12, paragraph 4
Result
273 for · 352 against · 32 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 13:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 16 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0161/2026 – Tomáš Kubín – Article 12, § 4 – Am 95
Vote id
194120
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 273 for, 352 against, 32 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 42 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 27Against 5Abst. 10No vote 3 of 45Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 109Against 9Abst. 4No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 3No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
EPPFor 16Against 150Abst. 2No vote 17 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ECRFor 2Against 71Abst. 4No vote 5 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 24Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 4Against 16Abst. 8No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland100
France300
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 1; Directive (EU) 2020/262 General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related productsAmendment287 for, 352 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 651 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.87 623 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 4 — part 3 Banking Union – annual report 2025Split vote263 for, 310 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 541 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 565 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 563 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 138 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment289 for, 349 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 605 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote299 for, 354 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 609 voters
29 Apr 2026Citation 44 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote277 for, 342 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.86 577 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.86 574 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 30 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote302 for, 336 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 46 %r · shared0.86 590 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 95 to article 12, paragraph 4 — Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194120, reference 2025/0580(CNS). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194120 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194120,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 95 to article 12, paragraph 4 — Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194120}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194120},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194120, reference 2025/0580(CNS). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}