Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital C — part 1

2025 Commission report on North Macedonia

Vote
Recital C — part 1
Decision
No. 14 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
563 for · 82 against · 11 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:27
More facts (6)
Position
vote 27 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: ESN, ECR
Official label
A10-0162/2026 – Thomas Waitz – Recital C/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0162
Dossier
2025/2254(INI)
Vote id
194113
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 563 for, 82 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 86 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas bilateral issues should be resolved bilaterally and in line with international law and should not be used to block or further politicise the enlargement process;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 3Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 161Against 9Abst. 0No vote 15 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 67Against 9Abst. 2No vote 4 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 38Against 36Abst. 3No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.24
ESNFor 7Against 15Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
No groupFor 13Against 10Abst. 4No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland100
France300
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 63

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 63 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 7 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSeparate vote462 for, 68 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.75 520 voters
30 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 8 Supporting democratic resilience in ArmeniaSeparate vote454 for, 90 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.75 530 voters
9 Oct 2024Separate vote on paragraph 8 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integrationSeparate vote527 for, 82 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.74 592 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesFinal504 for, 74 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.74 558 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 14 — part 2 Supporting democratic resilience in ArmeniaSplit vote445 for, 98 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Patriots, ESNr · shared0.73 521 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Committee of the RegionsFinal549 for, 97 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.73 596 voters
9 Oct 2024Separate vote on paragraph 17 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integrationSeparate vote542 for, 70 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.72 593 voters
3 Apr 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Immediate risk of further repression by Lukashenka’s regime in Belarus - threats from the Investigative CommitteeSplit vote477 for, 113 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.72 549 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 6 — part 2 Supporting democratic resilience in ArmeniaSplit vote458 for, 88 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.71 527 voters
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on AlbaniaFinal502 for, 120 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.71 621 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194113
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital C — part 1 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194113, reference 2025/2254(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194113 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194113,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital C — part 1 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194113}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194113},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194113, reference 2025/2254(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}