Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5 to citation 4

2025 Commission report on North Macedonia

Vote
Amendment 5 to citation 4
Decision
No. 14 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
145 for · 489 against · 23 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:26
More facts (6)
Position
vote 26 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0162/2026 – Thomas Waitz – Citation 4 – Am 5
Text
Report A-10-2026-0162
Dossier
2025/2254(INI)
Vote id
194111
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 145 for, 489 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 22 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 120Abst. 2No vote 13 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 9 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 6Against 162Abst. 0No vote 17 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 71Against 2Abst. 3No vote 6 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 37Against 35Abst. 6No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 11Abst. 12No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Cyprus001
Czechia020
Germany016
Spain100
France010
Greece040
Luxembourg100
Poland010
Romania101
Slovakia024

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 14 Clean Industrial DealAmendment129 for, 386 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.85 516 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Enforcement of the Digital Markets ActAmendment136 for, 401 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.84 539 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 92, adding text after paragraph 56 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment153 for, 467 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 596 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 579 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment135 for, 471 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 603 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 70, adding text after recital R — part 2 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment137 for, 440 against, 61 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 580 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 92, adding text after recital O Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment170 for, 441 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.82 572 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 27 to paragraph 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment135 for, 480 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.82 619 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 22 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment160 for, 464 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.82 642 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in IndonesiaAmendment87 for, 415 against, 65 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.82 526 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194111
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5 to citation 4 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194111, reference 2025/2254(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194111 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194111,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5 to citation 4 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194111}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194111},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194111, reference 2025/2254(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}