Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 10, after paragraph 76

2025 Commission report on North Macedonia

Vote
Amendment 10, after paragraph 76
Decision
No. 14 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
101 for · 466 against · 90 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:26
More facts (6)
Position
vote 25 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0162/2026 – Thomas Waitz – After § 76 – Am 10
Text
Report A-10-2026-0162
Dossier
2025/2254(INI)
Vote id
194110
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 101 for, 466 against, 90 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 121Abst. 2No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 2No vote 9 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 6Against 161Abst. 0No vote 18 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 60Against 2Abst. 15No vote 5 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
PatriotsFor 20Against 8Abst. 50No vote 7 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
ESNFor 11Against 1Abst. 13No vote 2 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
No groupFor 4Against 16Abst. 8No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Cyprus001
Czechia020
Germany151
Spain100
France010
Greece031
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania002
Slovakia042

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 78 2023 and 2024 reports on North MacedoniaAmendment165 for, 487 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ECR, Greensr · shared0.87 617 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 546 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 33 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment120 for, 481 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.85 606 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 587 voters
13 Feb 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 Repression by the Ortega-Murillo regime in Nicaragua, targeting human rights defenders, political opponents and religious communities in particularAmendment147 for, 395 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.85 493 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 45 2023 and 2024 reports on North MacedoniaAmendment177 for, 464 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by ECR, Greensr · shared0.85 617 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 98 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment199 for, 436 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 591 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 88 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment195 for, 443 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 592 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 100 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment196 for, 433 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.84 591 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 12 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAmendment165 for, 386 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 530 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194110
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 10, after paragraph 76 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194110, reference 2025/2254(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194110 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194110,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 10, after paragraph 76 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194110}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194110},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194110, reference 2025/2254(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}