Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 71 — part 2

2025 Commission report on North Macedonia

Vote
Paragraph 71 — part 2
Decision
No. 14 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
545 for · 22 against · 79 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: ESN, ECR
Official label
A10-0162/2026 – Thomas Waitz – § 71/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0162
Dossier
2025/2254(INI)
Vote id
194105
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 545 for, 22 against, 79 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 84 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “urges all parties to resume the work of the Joint Multidisciplinary Expert Commission on Historical and Educational Issues of Bulgaria and North Macedonia and to fulfil its work in good faith, thereby bringing societies closer together; condemns any attempts to replace historical monuments and/or artefacts, including the destruction of authentic cultural heritage; regrets the destruction and falsification of Bulgarian inscriptions;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 0Abst. 44No vote 8 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 123Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 149Against 13Abst. 1No vote 22 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 60Against 6Abst. 5No vote 11 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
PatriotsFor 61Against 0Abst. 17No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 15Against 3Abst. 10No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria002
Belgium002
Czechia001
Germany1012
Denmark003
Spain003
Finland001
France003
Croatia001
Italy004
Lithuania001
Luxembourg001
Latvia001
Netherlands004
Romania001
Sweden003
Slovenia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194105
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 71 — part 2 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194105, reference 2025/2254(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194105 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194105,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 71 — part 2 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194105}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194105},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194105, reference 2025/2254(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}