Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 71 — part 1

2025 Commission report on North Macedonia

Vote
Paragraph 71 — part 1
Result
545 for · 90 against · 13 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 20 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN · split vote: ESN, ECR
Official label
A10-0162/2026 – Thomas Waitz – § 71/1
Vote id
194104
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 545 for, 90 against, 13 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 84 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Acknowledges the existence of differing interpretations concerning the historical characteristics of Macedonian society; underscores that its report does not aim to prejudge or constrain scholarly discourse on these matters nor do such interpretations bear influence on its assessment of North Macedonia’s progress towards EU accession, which remains anchored in the Copenhagen criteria and the principles of good neighbourly relations;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 1Abst. 6No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 158Against 9Abst. 1No vote 17 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 31Against 43Abst. 1No vote 7 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
PatriotsFor 71Against 7Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 5Against 19Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
No groupFor 12Against 11Abst. 4No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria002
Cyprus100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1700
Finland200
France1200
Greece004
Croatia400
Hungary100
Italy1700
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta300
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal610
Romania700
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on paragraph 12 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSeparate vote468 for, 128 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.64 542 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 48 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote510 for, 78 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.63 588 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on recital C The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSeparate vote456 for, 112 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.63 540 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 13 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote462 for, 101 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.62 570 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote406 for, 122 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.62 498 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 1 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment513 for, 110 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.62 593 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.60 515 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 11 — part 2 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranSplit vote435 for, 113 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.60 524 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital J — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote422 for, 107 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.59 551 voters
16 Sept 2026Recital AC — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote466 for, 128 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.59 579 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 71 — part 1 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194104, reference 2025/2254(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194104 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194104,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 71 — part 1 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194104}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194104},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194104, reference 2025/2254(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}