Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 8 to paragraph 7

2025 Commission report on North Macedonia

Vote
Amendment 8 to paragraph 7
Decision
No. 14 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
269 for · 371 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:22
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0162/2026 – Thomas Waitz – § 7 – Am 8
Text
Report A-10-2026-0162
Dossier
2025/2254(INI)
Vote id
194087
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 269 for, 371 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 41 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 16Against 17Abst. 10No vote 2 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.09
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 9Against 113Abst. 3No vote 10 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
RenewFor 7Against 61Abst. 0No vote 10 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
EPPFor 46Against 121Abst. 2No vote 16 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.57
ECRFor 74Against 3Abst. 1No vote 4 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 70Against 8Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
ESNFor 25Against 1Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 22Against 2Abst. 2No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia400
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland010
France400
Greece100
Croatia100
Italy2400
Lithuania100
Latvia300
Netherlands300
Poland1800
Romania321
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 38 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment210 for, 357 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.80 530 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 78 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment211 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.79 533 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment209 for, 386 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.79 555 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 78 — part 1 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment204 for, 354 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.79 532 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 78 — part 2 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment200 for, 353 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.79 530 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 78 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment175 for, 366 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.78 532 voters
23 Oct 2025Final vote on motion B10-0457/2025 Specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuelsFinal180 for, 373 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.78 532 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 42 Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearAmendment227 for, 348 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.78 538 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 78 — part 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment195 for, 354 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.78 531 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendments 3 + 14 (voted as one) to paragraph 8 2023 and 2024 reports on North MacedoniaAmendment286 for, 387 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by The Left, ECRr · shared0.78 624 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194087
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 8 to paragraph 7 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194087, reference 2025/2254(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194087 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194087,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8 to paragraph 7 — 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194087}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194087},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194087, reference 2025/2254(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}