Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 17, after paragraph 48

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Vote
Amendment 17, after paragraph 48
Result
144 for · 430 against · 58 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 51 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0106/2026 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 48 – Am 17
Vote id
194073
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 144 for, 430 against, 58 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 23 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 39Abst. 2No vote 4 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 120Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 10Against 144Abst. 8No vote 23 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
ECRFor 32Against 5Abst. 38No vote 7 of 82Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
PatriotsFor 62Against 8Abst. 5No vote 10 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 16Against 4Abst. 5No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0120
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland010
France030
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 632 members

No vote recorded, 87

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 87 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment197 for, 421 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 555 voters
15 Dec 2025Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria) Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)Other130 for, 316 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.88 400 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 84 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 10; Directive (UE) 2015/2302; Article 18, paragraph 2 Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspectsAmendment195 for, 411 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 545 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 571 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 536 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment182 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 531 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 19 to paragraph 45 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment202 for, 441 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 568 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 89 to paragraph 252, after point xiii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment213 for, 443 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.87 571 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4 to recital C Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionAmendment210 for, 432 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 576 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 406 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 551 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 17, after paragraph 48 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194073, reference 2025/2256(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194073 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194073,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 17, after paragraph 48 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194073}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194073},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194073, reference 2025/2256(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}