Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 29 to paragraph 39

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Vote
Amendment 29 to paragraph 39
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
193 for · 431 against · 28 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:08
More facts (6)
Position
vote 31 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0106/2026 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 39 – Am 29
Text
Report A-10-2026-0106
Dossier
2025/2256(INI)
Vote id
194058
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 193 for, 431 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 4 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 121Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 2Against 69Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 7Against 155Abst. 6No vote 17 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 3No vote 5 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 65Against 0Abst. 13No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 19Against 0Abst. 5No vote 5 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium040
Bulgaria120
Germany090
Denmark040
Estonia010
Spain010
Finland030
France0130
Ireland050
Italy010
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania020
Sweden120
Slovenia020
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 551 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 14, adding text after recital 2 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment180 for, 403 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 541 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment178 for, 383 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.95 518 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 48 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment188 for, 473 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 609 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 84 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 10; Directive (UE) 2015/2302; Article 18, paragraph 2 Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspectsAmendment195 for, 411 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 563 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment197 for, 421 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 570 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment182 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 551 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 548 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 555 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 89 to paragraph 252, after point xiii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment213 for, 443 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.95 588 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194058
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194058, reference 2025/2256(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194058 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194058,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194058}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194058},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194058, reference 2025/2256(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}