Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 13 to paragraph 36

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Vote
Amendment 13 to paragraph 36
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
196 for · 457 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0106/2026 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 36 – Am 13
Text
Report A-10-2026-0106
Dossier
2025/2256(INI)
Vote id
194054
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 196 for, 457 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 124Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 8 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 165Abst. 2No vote 17 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 74Against 2Abst. 1No vote 5 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 1Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 19Against 6Abst. 2No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia400
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece100
Croatia100
Italy2220
Lithuania100
Latvia300
Netherlands201
Poland1700
Romania600
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.99 643 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 643 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 560 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 643 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment178 for, 435 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 563 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 600 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 612 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment173 for, 426 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 554 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 27 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment173 for, 433 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 557 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.97 578 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194054
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 13 to paragraph 36 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194054, reference 2025/2256(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194054 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194054,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 13 to paragraph 36 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194054}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194054},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194054, reference 2025/2256(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}