Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4 to paragraph 22

2025 Commission report on Türkiye

Vote
Amendment 4 to paragraph 22
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
342 for · 260 against · 61 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:06
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew
Official label
A10-0106/2026 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 22 – Am 4
Text
Report A-10-2026-0106
Dossier
2025/2256(INI)
Vote id
194050
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 342 for, 260 against, 61 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 52 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 9Against 0Abst. 35No vote 1 of 45Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.69
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 23Against 101Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
RenewFor 70Against 1Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 20Against 147Abst. 2No vote 16 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 76Against 0Abst. 2No vote 4 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 64Against 0Abst. 14No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
ESNFor 18Against 5Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.54
No groupFor 16Against 6Abst. 5No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Cyprus100
Czechia101
Germany700
Spain100
France100
Greece202
Luxembourg100
Poland001
Romania101
Slovakia150

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

No vote recorded, 56

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 56 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2026Amendment 29 to Article 11 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment353 for, 254 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 57 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.65 573 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 18, adding text after recital 4 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAmendment270 for, 325 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.62 560 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 30 to Article 1, after paragraph 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment369 for, 236 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.61 570 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 38 — part 1 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAmendment316 for, 161 against, 175 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.61 648 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 83 to Article 3 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment332 for, 303 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by EPP, The Leftr · shared0.60 606 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendments 34 + 86 (voted as one) to Article 9 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment327 for, 312 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by EPP, The Leftr · shared0.60 605 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendments 26 + 31 + 6 + 21 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 3 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment362 for, 235 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by EPP, ECR, Renew, Greensr · shared0.60 562 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment346 for, 254 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 57 %Requested by EPP, Renew, Greensr · shared0.59 563 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 1 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment345 for, 237 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 58 %Requested by EPP, Renew, Greensr · shared0.59 560 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 21 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeAmendment216 for, 330 against, 76 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.59 568 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194050
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4 to paragraph 22 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194050, reference 2025/2256(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194050 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194050,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4 to paragraph 22 — 2025 Commission report on Türkiye}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194050}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194050},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194050, reference 2025/2256(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}