Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3 to recital T

Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace

Vote
Amendment 3 to recital T
Result
197 for · 403 against · 28 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:34
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 8 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0150/2026 – Leoluca Orlando – Recital T – Am 3
Vote id
194014
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 197 for, 403 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 31Against 1Abst. 13No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.53
S&DFor 85Against 19Abst. 2No vote 29 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
RenewFor 8Against 56Abst. 1No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
EPPFor 5Against 158Abst. 1No vote 21 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 2Against 73Abst. 0No vote 7 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 2Against 74Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 4Against 16Abst. 6No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
No groupFor 17Against 6Abst. 5No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium030
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia040
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
Finland010
France040
Greece010
Croatia010
Italy0230
Lithuania010
Latvia030
Netherlands030
Poland0180
Romania220
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 628 members

No vote recorded, 91

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 91 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 54 to paragraph 1, point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment199 for, 399 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 562 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment172 for, 379 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.93 525 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment184 for, 380 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.92 525 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment177 for, 389 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.92 522 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment169 for, 390 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.92 527 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment179 for, 376 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.91 525 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 55 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment206 for, 391 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 557 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment175 for, 387 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.90 527 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 41, adding text after recital P Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment225 for, 396 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 570 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment184 for, 367 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.90 526 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 7 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3 to recital T — Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194014, reference 2025/2216(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194014 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194014,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3 to recital T — Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194014}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194014},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194014, reference 2025/2216(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}