Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 31

2025 Commission report on Montenegro

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 31
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2026
Result
454 for · 143 against · 56 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 14:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 8 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0143/2026 – Marjan Šarec – § 31
Text
Report A-10-2026-0143
Dossier
2025/2253(INI)
Vote id
194007
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 454 for, 143 against, 56 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 155Against 6Abst. 7No vote 17 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 9Against 64Abst. 2No vote 7 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
PatriotsFor 0Against 37Abst. 39No vote 9 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 9Against 10Abst. 8No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseFinal347 for, 165 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Left, Renewr · shared0.90 497 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 96 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote413 for, 197 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 572 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote419 for, 180 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.89 578 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 25 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote451 for, 145 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 595 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote382 for, 159 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.89 506 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote435 for, 190 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 588 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BF Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote422 for, 180 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 582 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote384 for, 158 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.89 509 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesSplit vote455 for, 147 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.89 560 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote421 for, 178 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.89 580 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194007
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 31 — 2025 Commission report on Montenegro”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 194007, reference 2025/2253(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194007 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-194007,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 31 — 2025 Commission report on Montenegro}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194007}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/194007},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194007, reference 2025/2253(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}