Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote

Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)

Vote
Final vote
Result
181 for · 439 against · 38 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 June 2026, 13:59
More facts (6)
Effect
Failed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 16 of 16 on the decision
Official label
A10-0161/2026 – Tomáš Kubín – Commission proposal to the Council
Vote id
193822
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 181 for, 439 against, 38 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Failed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 3 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 9Against 108Abst. 9No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
RenewFor 14Against 55Abst. 2No vote 7 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
EPPFor 136Against 22Abst. 11No vote 16 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
ECRFor 14Against 60Abst. 3No vote 5 of 82Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
PatriotsFor 5Against 72Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ESNFor 1Against 20Abst. 2No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 2Against 14Abst. 11No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium010
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France090
Greece030
Ireland030
Italy080
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 82 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment248 for, 378 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.64 585 voters
23 Oct 2024Final vote — text as a whole General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsFinal233 for, 360 against, 59 abstained Rejected For 36 %r · shared0.60 588 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Final231 for, 389 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.60 606 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 45 to Article 2 — part 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment253 for, 379 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.59 592 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point s — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote182 for, 369 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.56 521 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment225 for, 325 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by Patriots, EPPr · shared0.56 524 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment258 for, 323 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.55 596 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital K — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote201 for, 310 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.55 493 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 47 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment259 for, 325 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.55 596 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 27 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote204 for, 380 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.55 552 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote — Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)”. Vote, 17 June 2026. votingId 193822, reference 2025/0580(CNS). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/193822 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-17-193822,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote — Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/193822}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-17/193822},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193822, reference 2025/0580(CNS). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}