Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Middle East

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle East

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Middle East
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 15 Jun 2026
Result
336 for · 86 against · 11 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
15 June 2026, 18:12
More facts (4)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle East
Vote id
193975
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 336 for, 86 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 3Against 76Abst. 0No vote 57 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 32 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 113Against 0Abst. 0No vote 72 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 30Against 0Abst. 0No vote 51 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 46Against 9Abst. 5No vote 25 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
ESNFor 12Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 1Abst. 6No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria300
Belgium200
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Czechia500
Germany2100
Denmark200
Estonia100
Spain1100
Finland300
France200
Greece600
Croatia400
Hungary300
Ireland200
Italy600
Lithuania200
Luxembourg200
Latvia100
Malta100
Netherlands400
Poland1700
Portugal400
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia300
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 433 members

No vote recorded, 286

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 286 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal520 for, 126 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.84 383 voters
25 Mar 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE Group — Iran Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group – IranOther426 for, 77 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.76 334 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.74 370 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsFinal343 for, 160 against, 150 abstained Adopted For 53 %r · shared0.71 397 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 71 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceSeparate vote458 for, 178 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.67 396 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Amendment365 for, 211 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.66 396 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment353 for, 169 against, 131 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by S&D, EPPr · shared0.65 385 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment397 for, 139 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.64 352 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment372 for, 139 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.63 370 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 8 — part 1 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeAmendment427 for, 151 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.62 371 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-15/193975
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Middle East — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle East”. Vote, 15 June 2026. votingId 193975. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-15/193975 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-15-193975,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Middle East — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle East}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-15/193975}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-15/193975},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193975. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}