Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2, after paragraph 4

Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts

Vote
Amendment 2, after paragraph 4
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
184 for · 348 against · 28 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:36
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 17 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0247/2026 – After § 4 – Am 2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0247
Dossier
2026/2737(RSP)
Vote id
193418
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 184 for, 348 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 1No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 87Against 8Abst. 7No vote 34 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
RenewFor 2Against 62Abst. 0No vote 13 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 0Against 135Abst. 0No vote 48 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 3Against 44Abst. 19No vote 15 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.50
PatriotsFor 8Against 61Abst. 0No vote 16 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 3Against 15Abst. 1No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria113
Belgium200
Bulgaria200
Germany1100
Denmark030
Estonia200
Spain1500
Finland100
France1000
Greece100
Croatia200
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy1800
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia010
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal600
Romania230
Sweden104

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 560 members

No vote recorded, 157

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 157 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 480 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 483 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 484 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2026Proposal to reject the text Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)Rejection198 for, 453 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.89 519 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn RiveraAmendment186 for, 336 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 465 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 165 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment210 for, 418 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 507 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 481 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 57, adding text after recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 474 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 37 to paragraph 16 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment185 for, 364 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 462 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 196 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment202 for, 428 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 505 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 7 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193418
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2, after paragraph 4 — Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193418, reference 2026/2737(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193418 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193418,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2, after paragraph 4 — Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193418}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193418},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193418, reference 2026/2737(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}