Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4 — part 1, after paragraph 4

Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts

Vote
Amendment 4 — part 1, after paragraph 4
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
155 for · 382 against · 26 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:36
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 17 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN · split vote: ESN
Official label
RC-B10-0247/2026 – After § 4 – Am 4/1
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0247
Dossier
2026/2737(RSP)
Vote id
193416
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 155 for, 382 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Notes that the Commission started exploratory talks with the Taliban in 2025, following a call from 19 EU Member States to coordinate a strategy for the return of Afghan nationals; notes that the Commission now plans to invite representatives of the Taliban for talks on the return of Afghans;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 7 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 41Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
S&DFor 1Against 104Abst. 0No vote 31 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 1Against 64Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 1Against 130Abst. 2No vote 50 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 52Against 0Abst. 15No vote 14 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
PatriotsFor 64Against 0Abst. 6No vote 15 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 5Abst. 3No vote 9 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria020
Czechia030
Germany0240
Denmark110
Estonia010
Spain0140
Finland030
France040
Greece020
Croatia030
Hungary030
Ireland030
Italy050
Lithuania020
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta010
Netherlands040
Poland0200
Portugal070
Romania080
Sweden040
Slovenia041
Slovakia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 563 members

No vote recorded, 154

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 154 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 531 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 57 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment200 for, 461 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 523 voters
27 Apr 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — ‘One Europe, one market’ Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – ‘One Europe, one market’Other132 for, 327 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.96 385 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.96 390 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 53 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment197 for, 464 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.96 521 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 530 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 41 to paragraph 53 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment201 for, 444 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 527 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 522 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.95 504 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment180 for, 381 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.95 459 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 7 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193416
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4 — part 1, after paragraph 4 — Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193416, reference 2026/2737(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193416 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193416,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4 — part 1, after paragraph 4 — Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193416}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193416},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193416, reference 2026/2737(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}