Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5 to paragraph 4

Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts

Vote
Amendment 5 to paragraph 4
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
295 for · 189 against · 73 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 17 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Patriots, Renew
Official label
RC-B10-0247/2026 – § 4 – Am 5
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0247
Dossier
2026/2737(RSP)
Vote id
193414
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 295 for, 189 against, 73 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 53 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 104Against 0Abst. 3No vote 29 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 54Against 4Abst. 5No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
EPPFor 42Against 79Abst. 8No vote 54 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
ECRFor 1Against 28Abst. 37No vote 15 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
PatriotsFor 6Against 46Abst. 16No vote 17 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.51
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 8Against 9Abst. 3No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Czechia010
Germany250
Spain100
France100
Greece202
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania100
Slovakia120

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 557 members

No vote recorded, 160

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 160 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 99 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote297 for, 334 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.79 503 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote267 for, 297 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.77 456 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote299 for, 354 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.77 516 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote351 for, 272 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Members (B), Renewr · shared0.77 511 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 83 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote272 for, 320 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.77 483 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 37 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote245 for, 275 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Members, S&Dr · shared0.76 517 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 68 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote262 for, 309 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.76 475 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 84 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote269 for, 313 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.76 482 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote276 for, 287 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 49 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.76 454 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital AC Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote276 for, 317 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.76 483 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 7 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193414
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 — Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193414, reference 2026/2737(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193414 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193414,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 — Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193414}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193414},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193414, reference 2026/2737(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}