Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3 to paragraph 4

Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran

Vote
Amendment 3 to paragraph 4
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
178 for · 379 against · 12 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:26
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 23 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0260/2026 – § 4 – Am 3
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0259
Dossier
2026/2733(RSP)
Vote id
193398
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 178 for, 379 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 32Abst. 4No vote 8 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 105Abst. 0No vote 31 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 11 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 9Against 129Abst. 0No vote 45 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 3No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 10Against 4Abst. 5No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium020
Bulgaria020
Germany0130
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0160
Finland010
France090
Greece010
Croatia030
Hungary020
Ireland010
Italy0180
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal060
Romania050
Sweden050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 569 members

No vote recorded, 148

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 148 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 48 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment195 for, 455 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.95 520 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 40 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment203 for, 422 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 517 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 422 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 512 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment198 for, 417 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 507 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.95 508 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 528 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 79 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment203 for, 446 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.95 524 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 415 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 490 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment204 for, 432 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 559 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 168 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment201 for, 419 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 510 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193398
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 — Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193398, reference 2026/2733(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193398 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193398,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 — Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193398}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193398},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193398, reference 2026/2733(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}