Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 18 — part 3

The need to reduce work-related fatalities

Vote
Paragraph 18 — part 3
Result
313 for · 94 against · 58 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 14:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: Patriots
Official label
B10-0244/2026 – § 18/3
Vote id
193338
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 313 for, 94 against, 58 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 67 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “highlights the importance of ensuring concrete added value in support of national enforcement authorities, including through strengthened concerted and joint labour inspections and the possibility to contribute more effectively to identifying and tackling violations; stresses the need to promote greater alignment and simplification of rules on labour mobility and related control procedures, including through more uniform rules and more effective information exchange, in line with ELA guidance;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 0Abst. 1No vote 13 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 65 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 50Against 3Abst. 1No vote 23 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 109Against 2Abst. 2No vote 70 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 0Against 30Abst. 30No vote 21 of 81Majority line TieClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
PatriotsFor 2Against 35Abst. 19No vote 29 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
ESNFor 0Against 19Abst. 2No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 10Against 5Abst. 3No vote 12 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1200
Denmark300
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy200
Lithuania100
Latvia100
Netherlands300
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 465 members

No vote recorded, 252

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 252 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Recital S — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote344 for, 111 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 455 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 410 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicalsFinal486 for, 171 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.89 436 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Final vote Common data platform on chemicals, establishing a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicalsFinal481 for, 170 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.89 435 voters
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningFinal447 for, 128 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.89 429 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 5 — part 2 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment452 for, 144 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 412 voters
7 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 14 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSeparate vote455 for, 151 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 426 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point w — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote395 for, 151 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greens, The Leftr · shared0.88 380 voters
22 Jan 2026Separate vote on paragraph 6 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSeparate vote424 for, 158 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 412 voters
21 Oct 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicalsFinal469 for, 126 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.88 426 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 18 — part 3 — The need to reduce work-related fatalities”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193338, reference 2025/3046(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193338 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193338,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 18 — part 3 — The need to reduce work-related fatalities}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193338}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193338},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193338, reference 2025/3046(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}