Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 18 — part 1

The need to reduce work-related fatalities

Vote
Paragraph 18 — part 1
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
323 for · 97 against · 55 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 14:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: Patriots
Official label
B10-0244/2026 – § 18/1
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0244
Dossier
2025/3046(RSP)
Vote id
193336
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 323 for, 97 against, 55 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Welcomes the Commission’s evaluation report on the European Labour Authority (ELA), recognising its role in the effective enforcement of EU labour law and occupational safety and health rules, in particular in cross-border contexts and high-risk sectors,’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 1Abst. 0No vote 13 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 60 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 48Against 5Abst. 1No vote 23 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 112Against 1Abst. 0No vote 70 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 28Abst. 32No vote 21 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
PatriotsFor 1Against 39Abst. 19No vote 26 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
ESNFor 1Against 20Abst. 0No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 12Against 3Abst. 3No vote 12 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy200
Lithuania100
Latvia100
Netherlands300
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 475 members

No vote recorded, 242

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 242 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 442 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Economic and Social CommitteeFinal478 for, 146 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.88 446 voters
21 Oct 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicalsFinal469 for, 126 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.88 434 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Final vote Common data platform on chemicals, establishing a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicalsFinal481 for, 170 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.88 444 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 419 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 422 voters
21 Oct 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Common data platform on chemicals, establishing a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicalsFinal471 for, 123 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.87 432 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeFinal454 for, 161 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.87 444 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicalsFinal486 for, 171 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.87 445 voters
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningFinal447 for, 128 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.87 438 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193336
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 18 — part 1 — The need to reduce work-related fatalities”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193336, reference 2025/3046(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193336 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193336,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 18 — part 1 — The need to reduce work-related fatalities}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193336}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193336},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193336, reference 2025/3046(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}