Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: recital AF

Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap

Vote
Separate vote: recital AF
Result
285 for · 198 against · 30 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 14:00
More facts (6)
Position
vote 35 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0083/2026 – Eleonora Meleti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – Recital AF
Vote id
193117
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 285 for, 198 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 56 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 84Against 0Abst. 3No vote 49 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 36Against 19Abst. 4No vote 18 of 77Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
EPPFor 80Against 32Abst. 11No vote 60 of 183Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
ECRFor 0Against 58Abst. 2No vote 21 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
PatriotsFor 0Against 64Abst. 2No vote 19 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ESNFor 2Against 20Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 6Against 5Abst. 8No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium102
Bulgaria201
Czechia201
Germany2151
Denmark020
Estonia100
Spain1400
Finland300
France003
Greece200
Croatia400
Hungary300
Ireland300
Italy310
Lithuania102
Luxembourg200
Latvia110
Malta100
Netherlands130
Poland1700
Portugal700
Romania610
Sweden040
Slovenia400
Slovakia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 513 members

No vote recorded, 204

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 204 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentFinal360 for, 210 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 442 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesFinal420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.87 470 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 10 — part 2 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment362 for, 243 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 456 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 53 Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsSeparate vote379 for, 180 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 461 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 24 — part 2 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Split vote330 for, 244 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 450 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 47 — part 2 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Split vote365 for, 224 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 452 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 17 — part 3 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Split vote367 for, 214 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 452 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.82 468 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 17 — part 2 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Split vote364 for, 221 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 453 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2024 budget: assessing the implementation of the gender mainstreaming methodology in the EU budgetFinal389 for, 213 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.81 471 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: recital AF — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193117, reference 2025/2039(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193117 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193117,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: recital AF — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193117}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193117},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193117, reference 2025/2039(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}