Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital S — part 2

Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap

Vote
Recital S — part 2
Result
273 for · 160 against · 79 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:59
More facts (6)
Position
vote 33 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0083/2026 – Eleonora Meleti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – Recital S/2
Vote id
193115
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 273 for, 160 against, 79 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 53 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘whereas its provision on carers’ right to leave of five working days per year is insufficient to provide adequate care or to organise formal care and is not covered by the same safeguards regarding remuneration and income support as other types of family leave;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 87Against 0Abst. 0No vote 49 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 42Against 12Abst. 5No vote 18 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.57
EPPFor 25Against 83Abst. 13No vote 62 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
ECRFor 3Against 34Abst. 24No vote 20 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
PatriotsFor 26Against 9Abst. 30No vote 20 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.19
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 1No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 12Against 1Abst. 6No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria015
Belgium012
Czechia004
Spain015
France2600
Greece001
Hungary003
Italy005
Netherlands060
Poland003
Portugal002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 512 members

No vote recorded, 205

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 205 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote280 for, 265 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 421 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Amendment313 for, 270 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 461 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 24 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote338 for, 278 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.78 480 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 6 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Amendment299 for, 293 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 463 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.78 428 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 50 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment323 for, 247 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.77 447 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote325 for, 296 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.77 472 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital G — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote252 for, 258 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.77 420 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 27 to paragraph 27 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment233 for, 303 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 423 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment336 for, 266 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.77 479 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital S — part 2 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193115, reference 2025/2039(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193115 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193115,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital S — part 2 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193115}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193115},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193115, reference 2025/2039(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}