Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 64

Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 64
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
266 for · 234 against · 25 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0083/2026 – Eleonora Meleti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 64
Text
Report A-10-2026-0083
Dossier
2025/2039(INI)
Vote id
193102
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 266 for, 234 against, 25 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 51 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 90Against 0Abst. 0No vote 46 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 38Against 17Abst. 4No vote 18 of 77Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
EPPFor 22Against 96Abst. 5No vote 60 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
ECRFor 1Against 60Abst. 2No vote 18 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 26Against 37Abst. 7No vote 15 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
ESNFor 1Against 20Abst. 3No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
No groupFor 12Against 4Abst. 4No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium200
Bulgaria200
Germany1200
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1400
Finland100
France900
Greece100
Croatia100
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy900
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal600
Romania400
Sweden500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 525 members

No vote recorded, 192

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 192 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote280 for, 265 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 434 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 24 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote338 for, 278 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 494 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 27 to paragraph 27 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment233 for, 303 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 437 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 1, point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment308 for, 313 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 513 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 63 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment261 for, 266 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.82 439 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 50 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment323 for, 247 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.82 456 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Split vote287 for, 278 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 461 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Amendment313 for, 270 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 471 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital G — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote252 for, 258 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 433 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 64 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote262 for, 287 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 446 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193102
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 64 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193102, reference 2025/2039(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193102 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193102,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 64 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193102}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193102},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193102, reference 2025/2039(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}