Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 37 — part 1

Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap

Vote
Paragraph 37 — part 1
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
286 for · 182 against · 65 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:51
More facts (6)
Position
vote 11 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0083/2026 – Eleonora Meleti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 37/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0083
Dossier
2025/2039(INI)
Vote id
193092
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 286 for, 182 against, 65 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 54 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘gender mainstreaming and gender’ and ‘to be implemented’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 91Against 0Abst. 0No vote 45 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 55Against 4Abst. 1No vote 17 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 18Against 106Abst. 2No vote 57 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
ECRFor 5Against 56Abst. 2No vote 18 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 31Against 6Abst. 33No vote 15 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ESNFor 0Against 5Abst. 19No vote 3 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 6Against 5Abst. 8No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium200
Bulgaria200
Germany1200
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1500
Finland100
France1000
Greece100
Croatia100
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy700
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal600
Romania500
Sweden500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 533 members

No vote recorded, 184

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 184 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote280 for, 265 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 440 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote325 for, 296 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 490 voters
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AIOther244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 56 %r · shared0.82 344 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 6 The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in PakistanAmendment312 for, 248 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 460 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 44 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote280 for, 322 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.81 490 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital Z Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote293 for, 269 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 458 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 60 2023 and 2024 reports on MontenegroAmendment276 for, 307 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 480 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 1, point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment308 for, 313 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 518 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 52 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment379 for, 260 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 488 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.81 447 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193092
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 37 — part 1 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193092, reference 2025/2039(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193092 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193092,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 37 — part 1 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193092}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193092},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193092, reference 2025/2039(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}