Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 22

Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 22
Result
321 for · 118 against · 102 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0083/2026 – Eleonora Meleti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 22
Vote id
193085
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 321 for, 118 against, 102 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 59 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 85Against 3Abst. 5No vote 43 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 44Against 17Abst. 1No vote 15 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.56
EPPFor 63Against 37Abst. 26No vote 57 of 183Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ECRFor 5Against 30Abst. 29No vote 17 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.20
PatriotsFor 28Against 9Abst. 35No vote 13 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
ESNFor 0Against 19Abst. 5No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 16Against 3Abst. 1No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium001
Bulgaria001
Czechia003
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain002
France040
Greece200
Croatia001
Italy0016
Lithuania010
Latvia011
Netherlands020
Poland1170
Romania204
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 541 members

No vote recorded, 176

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 176 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote394 for, 227 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.70 503 voters
28 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote394 for, 217 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.68 495 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote280 for, 265 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.66 447 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Amendment313 for, 270 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.65 487 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment336 for, 266 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.65 505 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 24 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote338 for, 278 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.65 508 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 21 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote359 for, 218 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.63 494 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 25 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote361 for, 218 against, 60 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.63 497 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on citation 6 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote287 for, 226 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.62 440 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 50 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment323 for, 247 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.62 471 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 22 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193085, reference 2025/2039(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193085 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193085,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 22 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193085}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193085},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193085, reference 2025/2039(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}