Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2, after paragraph 14

Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap

Vote
Amendment 2, after paragraph 14
Result
181 for · 342 against · 20 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members
Official label
A10-0083/2026 – Eleonora Meleti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – After § 14 – Am 2
Vote id
193082
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 181 for, 342 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 8 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 93Abst. 0No vote 42 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 4Against 55Abst. 1No vote 17 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 6Against 105Abst. 18No vote 54 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
ECRFor 64Against 0Abst. 1No vote 16 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 72Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 9Abst. 0No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium020
Bulgaria020
Germany0120
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0150
Finland010
France190
Greece010
Croatia010
Hungary020
Ireland010
Italy0100
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal060
Romania050
Sweden050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 543 members

No vote recorded, 174

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 174 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 489 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 43 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment198 for, 438 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 502 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment180 for, 419 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 466 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 59 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment194 for, 467 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 504 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 446 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.95 491 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 68 to paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment195 for, 450 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.94 494 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 497 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 48 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 419 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 487 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 491 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 45 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote204 for, 421 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.94 501 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2, after paragraph 14 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193082, reference 2025/2039(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193082 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193082,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2, after paragraph 14 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193082}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193082},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193082, reference 2025/2039(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}