Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 20 May 2026
Result
347 for · 165 against · 25 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:52
More facts (7)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 40 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, Renew
Official label
B10-0245/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0245
Dossier
2026/2607(RSP)
Vote id
193026
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 347 for, 165 against, 25 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 27Against 1Abst. 10No vote 7 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.57
GreensFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 106Against 0Abst. 0No vote 30 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 57Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 114Against 3Abst. 4No vote 62 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 4Against 53Abst. 6No vote 18 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
PatriotsFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 15 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 2Against 15Abst. 4No vote 9 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Bulgaria400
Czechia200
Germany1900
Denmark200
Estonia100
Spain1200
Finland300
France200
Greece600
Croatia500
Hungary300
Ireland400
Italy410
Lithuania200
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta001
Netherlands200
Poland1800
Portugal500
Romania800
Sweden300
Slovenia113
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 537 members

No vote recorded, 180

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 180 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.95 476 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.95 492 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.95 477 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 19 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote445 for, 188 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 489 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 34 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote440 for, 189 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 498 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote453 for, 178 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.94 489 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 88 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote447 for, 199 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.94 489 voters
26 Nov 2025Recital L — part 2 EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticSplit vote452 for, 201 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 501 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedFinal415 for, 193 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.94 486 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BF Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote422 for, 180 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 481 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193026
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 193026, reference 2026/2607(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193026 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-193026,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193026}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193026},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193026, reference 2026/2607(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}