Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1, after recital C

Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response

Vote
Amendment 1, after recital C
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 20 May 2026
Result
201 for · 438 against · 4 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 29 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
B10-0245/2026 – After recital C – Am 1
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0245
Dossier
2026/2607(RSP)
Vote id
193016
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 4 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 120Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 153Abst. 0No vote 28 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 2No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 4Abst. 2No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Czechia100
Germany1500
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 643 members

No vote recorded, 74

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 74 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.99 572 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.99 607 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 6, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 426 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.99 552 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.98 571 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 606 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 443 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 580 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 57 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment200 for, 461 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 600 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 551 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment179 for, 396 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 537 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 93 to Article 4, after paragraph 2 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAmendment193 for, 455 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 593 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193016
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1, after recital C — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 193016, reference 2026/2607(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193016 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-193016,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1, after recital C — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193016}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193016},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193016, reference 2026/2607(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}