Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4 to paragraph 15

Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response

Vote
Amendment 4 to paragraph 15
Result
184 for · 454 against · 6 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
B10-0245/2026 – § 15 – Am 4
Vote id
193000
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 184 for, 454 against, 6 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 3 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 122Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 156Abst. 0No vote 26 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 65Against 10Abst. 1No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 4Abst. 5No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark030
Spain020
Finland020
France040
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 644 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 24 to paragraph 33 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment184 for, 454 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 584 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 76 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment179 for, 439 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.96 566 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 53 to paragraph 99 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment167 for, 470 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.96 599 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12 to paragraph 185 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment185 for, 426 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 573 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 70 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment185 for, 447 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.96 581 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 16 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment190 for, 470 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 601 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 15 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment188 for, 470 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 603 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 30 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote194 for, 435 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.96 584 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 132, adding text after paragraph 27 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment186 for, 454 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 586 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 29 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment188 for, 456 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 603 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4 to paragraph 15 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 193000, reference 2026/2607(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193000 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-193000,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4 to paragraph 15 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193000}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193000},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193000, reference 2026/2607(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}