Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 11 — part 1

Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response

Vote
Paragraph 11 — part 1
Result
474 for · 73 against · 91 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:47
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: ECR
Official label
B10-0245/2026 – § 11/1
Vote id
192997
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 474 for, 73 against, 91 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Strongly condemns the closure of the Special Prosecutor’s Office in light of its evident impact on the investigation and prosecution of corruption,’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 1No vote 4 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 156Against 0Abst. 0No vote 27 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 34Against 3Abst. 39No vote 5 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
PatriotsFor 0Against 37Abst. 41No vote 7 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 8Against 10Abst. 7No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia010
Germany0150
France001
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland002
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 638 members

No vote recorded, 79

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 79 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Separate vote on paragraph 22 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedSeparate vote462 for, 128 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 602 voters
22 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal441 for, 125 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.86 572 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 4 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanSplit vote405 for, 68 against, 115 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.85 537 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of LawFinal455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.85 569 voters
8 Jul 2025Separate vote on citation 8 Security of energy supply in the EUSeparate vote504 for, 148 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.84 589 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal441 for, 131 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.84 594 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 4 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote428 for, 76 against, 103 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 536 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal429 for, 145 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.84 592 voters
13 Feb 2025Paragraph 9 — part 2 Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaSplit vote394 for, 113 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 492 voters
22 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedyFinal457 for, 103 against, 72 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.83 566 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 11 — part 1 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192997, reference 2026/2607(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192997 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192997,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 11 — part 1 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192997}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192997},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192997, reference 2026/2607(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}