Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3 to paragraph 4

Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response

Vote
Amendment 3 to paragraph 4
Result
189 for · 440 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
B10-0245/2026 – § 4 – Am 3
Vote id
192993
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 189 for, 440 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 3 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 123Abst. 0No vote 13 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 69Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 3Against 152Abst. 0No vote 28 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 66Against 2Abst. 7No vote 6 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
PatriotsFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 3Abst. 3No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Czechia201
Germany412
Spain100
France010
Greece110
Luxembourg100
Poland100
Romania100
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 639 members

No vote recorded, 78

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 78 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 15 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment188 for, 470 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 598 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 30 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote194 for, 435 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.97 579 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 10 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningAmendment191 for, 455 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.97 584 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 81 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment190 for, 443 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 594 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 16 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment190 for, 470 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 596 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 603 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.97 567 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 583 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 126 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 418 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.97 568 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 41 to paragraph 53 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment201 for, 444 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 597 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192993, reference 2026/2607(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192993 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192993,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192993}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192993},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192993, reference 2026/2607(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}