Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 65 to paragraph 1, point ap

Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly

Vote
Amendment 65 to paragraph 1, point ap
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 20 May 2026
Result
327 for · 264 against · 55 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 80 of 110 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0103/2026 – Andrey Kovatchev – § 1, point ap – Am 65
Text
Report A-10-2026-0103
Dossier
2025/2167(INI)
Vote id
192803
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 327 for, 264 against, 55 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 51 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 4Against 0Abst. 45No vote 4 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 2Against 67Abst. 2No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 8Against 148Abst. 0No vote 27 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 68Against 4Abst. 4No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
PatriotsFor 47Against 29Abst. 1No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
ESNFor 11Against 14Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
No groupFor 22Against 2Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France900
Greece200
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital G Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment320 for, 258 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 587 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 35 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment279 for, 333 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 591 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 7 Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for CourtsAmendment296 for, 252 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 556 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 143 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment281 for, 260 against, 121 abstained Adopted For 42 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 590 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 26 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment376 for, 236 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 602 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 173, adding text after paragraph 79 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment284 for, 314 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 586 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 11 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionAmendment353 for, 292 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.73 592 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 13 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment201 for, 345 against, 109 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 585 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 26 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment350 for, 264 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.71 582 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 40 to paragraph 19 — part 1 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment291 for, 201 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.71 518 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192803
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 65 to paragraph 1, point ap — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192803, reference 2025/2167(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192803 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192803,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 65 to paragraph 1, point ap — Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192803}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192803},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192803, reference 2025/2167(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}