Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Reduced US military deployment in Europe

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Reduced US military deployment in Europe

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Reduced US military deployment in Europe
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 18 May 2026
Result
342 for · 65 against · 41 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 May 2026, 18:15
More facts (4)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Reduced US military deployment in Europe
Vote id
192715
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 342 for, 65 against, 41 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 76 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 32Abst. 0No vote 10 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 81Against 0Abst. 0No vote 55 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 33 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 111Against 0Abst. 0No vote 72 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 8Against 2Abst. 34No vote 37 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.66
PatriotsFor 42Against 10Abst. 6No vote 27 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.59
ESNFor 3Against 10Abst. 0No vote 14 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
No groupFor 8Against 11Abst. 1No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria400
Belgium200
Bulgaria300
Czechia500
Germany1500
Denmark200
Estonia100
Spain1700
Finland200
France300
Greece600
Croatia400
Hungary400
Ireland200
Italy500
Lithuania200
Luxembourg200
Latvia100
Netherlands400
Poland1400
Portugal200
Romania400
Sweden400
Slovenia200
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 448 members

No vote recorded, 269

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 269 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Flagship European defence projects of common interestFinal448 for, 122 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.80 383 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 262 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote518 for, 67 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 388 voters
9 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureFinal469 for, 97 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.78 380 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Role of trade in strengthening the EU’s economic securityFinal415 for, 105 against, 142 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.77 426 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 260 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote506 for, 71 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 389 voters
17 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Defence Readiness 2030: assessment of needsFinal425 for, 120 against, 96 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.77 407 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 5 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote510 for, 67 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 384 voters
22 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challengesFinal483 for, 68 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.76 401 voters
18 Dec 2025Paragraph 11 — part 1 Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against LithuaniaSplit vote472 for, 61 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Left, Greensr · shared0.76 361 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 80 — part 1 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote512 for, 109 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.75 418 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192715
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Reduced US military deployment in Europe — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Reduced US military deployment in Europe”. Vote, 18 May 2026. votingId 192715. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192715 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-18-192715,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Reduced US military deployment in Europe — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Reduced US military deployment in Europe}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192715}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192715},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192715. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}