Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in Modena

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 18 May 2026
Result
134 for · 309 against · 3 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 May 2026, 18:12
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in Modena
Vote id
192713
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 57 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 34 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 103Abst. 1No vote 77 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 37 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 12Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 6Abst. 2No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Czechia200
Denmark100
Spain100
Finland100
France100
Greece100
Italy1400
Latvia100
Netherlands300
Poland1200
Romania300
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 446 members

No vote recorded, 271

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 271 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.99 428 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.99 426 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 38 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 458 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.99 408 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 439 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 415 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 414 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 409 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment193 for, 428 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 403 voters
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.98 373 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.98 398 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 3, introductory part Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsAmendment188 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 409 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192713
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in Modena”. Vote, 18 May 2026. votingId 192713. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192713 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-18-192713,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in Modena}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192713}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-18/192713},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192713. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}