Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2 to paragraph 5

Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela

Vote
Amendment 2 to paragraph 5
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
157 for · 329 against · 69 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP
Official label
RC-B10-0217/2026 – § 5 – Am 2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0226
Dossier
2026/2704(RSP)
Vote id
192369
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 157 for, 329 against, 69 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 6Against 2Abst. 19No vote 19 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.56
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 76Against 12Abst. 19No vote 28 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.57
RenewFor 1Against 63Abst. 0No vote 13 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 0Against 131Abst. 0No vote 54 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 1Against 69Abst. 1No vote 10 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 25Against 28Abst. 10No vote 22 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.17
ESNFor 2Against 17Abst. 4No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.61
No groupFor 3Against 7Abst. 15No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium030
Bulgaria030
Cyprus010
Czechia050
Germany0240
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0150
Finland030
France050
Greece020
Croatia010
Hungary040
Ireland040
Italy060
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Netherlands040
Poland0210
Portugal030
Romania070
Sweden050
Slovenia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 555 members

No vote recorded, 164

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 164 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 500 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 78 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment253 for, 361 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 512 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment241 for, 345 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 487 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurementAmendment261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 499 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 Enforcement of the Digital Markets ActAmendment186 for, 326 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 538 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 489 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment209 for, 359 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 484 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment185 for, 334 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 455 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 33 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment214 for, 389 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 521 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment210 for, 393 against, 45 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 515 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 4 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192369
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2 to paragraph 5 — Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192369, reference 2026/2704(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192369 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192369,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2 to paragraph 5 — Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192369}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192369},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192369, reference 2026/2704(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}