Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6 to paragraph 2

Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela

Vote
Amendment 6 to paragraph 2
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
49 for · 504 against · 20 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0217/2026 – § 2 – Am 6
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0226
Dossier
2026/2704(RSP)
Vote id
192366
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 49 for, 504 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 9 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 21Against 4Abst. 3No vote 18 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
GreensFor 4Against 40Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
S&DFor 0Against 111Abst. 3No vote 21 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 136Abst. 0No vote 47 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 0Against 68Abst. 3No vote 10 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 57Abst. 6No vote 22 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ESNFor 4Against 18Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
No groupFor 18Against 5Abst. 3No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium030
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Czechia050
Germany0260
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0170
Finland030
France050
Greece020
Croatia020
Hungary040
Ireland040
Italy060
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Netherlands040
Poland2200
Portugal030
Romania070
Sweden050
Slovenia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 573 members

No vote recorded, 146

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 146 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 4 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192366
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6 to paragraph 2 — Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192366, reference 2026/2704(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192366 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192366,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6 to paragraph 2 — Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192366}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192366},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192366, reference 2026/2704(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}