Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 30 Apr 2026
Result
439 for · 52 against · 71 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:09
More facts (7)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 3 of 9 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew
Official label
RC-B10-0216/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0232
Dossier
2026/2703(RSP)
Vote id
192365
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 439 for, 52 against, 71 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 12Against 11Abst. 5No vote 18 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.14
GreensFor 42Against 1Abst. 2No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 105Against 1Abst. 1No vote 28 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 59Against 6Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
EPPFor 123Against 7Abst. 2No vote 53 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 58Against 3Abst. 8No vote 12 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
PatriotsFor 29Against 2Abst. 35No vote 19 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
ESNFor 3Against 6Abst. 15No vote 3 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
No groupFor 8Against 15Abst. 3No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia120
Germany242
France100
Greece121
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania010
Slovakia330

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 562 members

No vote recorded, 157

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 157 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192365
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities”. Vote, 30 April 2026. votingId 192365, reference 2026/2703(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192365 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-30-192365,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192365}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-30/192365},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192365, reference 2026/2703(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}